Home › Prompts › Community › karpathy-guidelines

karpathy-guidelines

Any chat AICodingCommunity (CC0)

Note: Review and test before use. Provided as is, without warranty. See Terms.

Prompt

Download  
---
name: karpathy-guidelines
description: Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
license: MIT
---

# Karpathy Guidelines

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, derived from [Andrej Karpathy's observations](https://x.com/karpathy/status/2015883857489522876) on LLM coding pitfalls.

**Tradeoff:** These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.

## 1. Think Before Coding

**Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.**

Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.

## 2. Simplicity First

**Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.**

- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

## 3. Surgical Changes

**Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.**

When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.

When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.

## 4. Goal-Driven Execution

**Define success criteria. Loop until verified.**

Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" -> "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" -> "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" -> "Ensure tests pass before and after"

For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
\
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.

How to use

More: all coding prompts · all community prompts · prompt library

Related prompts

Safe refactor plan with small steps

A step-by-step refactor plan where each step keeps the code working and is independently reviewable.

Any chat AICoding

Debug an error with hypotheses

A debugging prompt that makes the model rank hypotheses and suggest the fastest checks instead of guessing a fix.

ChatGPTCoding

Thorough pull request review

A structured code review focused on correctness, security and maintainability, with severity labels and concrete fixes.

ClaudeCoding

Generate meaningful unit tests

Tests that cover behavior, edge cases and failure modes for a function, in your framework's style.

ClaudeCoding

Explain an unfamiliar codebase

Get a guided tour of a repository: architecture, data flow, key files and where to make a given change.

GeminiCoding

Write and explain a SQL query from a schema

Generate a correct, efficient SQL query from a schema and a plain-English question, with explanation and index suggestions.

GrokCoding

Get new rules weekly

One email a week: fresh rule files, agent tips, and what's changing in Cursor, Claude Code and Copilot. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

Opens the Rulestack Newsletter on beehiiv in a new tab. Or subscribe directly on beehiiv.